If I correctly understand the picture post above, it is a media newspaper report of the evidence that was presented in the case in court, and which was then published in the media, and reporting and publishing such accounts of the proceedings in a court by the media is perfectly legal, in fact in a democratic society it is one of the public duties of the media, and the public discussion of such reported court proceedings by the public is also perfectly legal.
It would only be illegal, if evidence that was to be presented in a future court case was published and or publicly discussed before the case had started, because doing that would be prejudicial to the defendant/defendants and or to the plaintiff/plaintiffs in any future legal court case, and might also prejudice and undermine the impartial prosecution of the case, and had any future jurors have seen such material before they had to hear and consider the case in court, that would have undermined their impartiality.
